Where’s the Outrage? 
Bush’s  defense of his phone-spying program has disturbing echoes of arguments once used  by South Africa’s apartheid regime. Why Americans should examine the parallels.  
Dec. 21, 2005 -  Back in the 1980s, when I was living in Johannesburg and reporting on apartheid  South Africa, a white neighbor proffered a tasteless confession. She was "quite  relieved," she told me, that new media restrictions prohibited our reporting on  government repression. No matter that Pretoria was detaining tens of thousands  of people without real evidence of wrongdoing. No matter that many of them,  including children, were being tortured—sometimes to death. No matter that  government hit squads were killing political opponents. No matter that police  were shooting into crowds of black civilians protesting against their  disenfranchisement. "It's so nice," confided my neighbor, "not to open the  papers and read all that bad news."
  
I thought about that neighbor this  week, as reports dribbled out about President George W. Bush's sanctioning of  warrantless eavesdropping on American conversations. For anyone who has lived  under an authoritarian regime, phone tapping—or at least the threat of it—is  always a given. But U.S. citizens have always been lucky enough to believe  themselves protected from such government intrusion. So why have they reacted so  insipidly to yet another post-9/11 erosion of U.S. civil liberties?...
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10562528/site/newsweek/
No comments:
Post a Comment